← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Calder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Portage Terriers MJHL 55 15 17 32 0.582 0.1646 0.1745 0.3666 0.3886
2019-20 Portage Terriers MJHL 59 11 18 29 0.491 0.1390 0.1390 0.3097 0.3097
2020-21 Portage Terriers MJHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.1213 0.1213 0.2701 0.2701
2021-22 MJHL 53 25 30 55 1.038 0.2936 0.2677 0.6539 0.5962
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 25 9 17 26 1.040
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 26 10 5 15 0.577
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 28 11 13 24 0.857
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 26 12 5 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2022-23 · Salve Regina
+231.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18371
Forward overall
#642
Forward born in 2001
#430
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.