IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Tzveyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — NAHL 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.0835 0.0858 0.2402 0.2467
2016-17 — NAHL 54 12 9 21 0.389 0.1429 0.1390 0.4110 0.3999
2017-18 — NCDC 50 13 32 45 0.900 0.3669 0.3413 0.7202 0.6699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Aurora D1 NCHA SO 16 2 7 9 0.562
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA — 16 2 7 9 0.562
2018-19 Aurora D1 NCHA FR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA — 27 5 13 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2018-19 · Aurora
+199.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14798
Forward overall
#676
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
George Splichal
Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.