IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Glaesmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Springfield Spirit NAHL 50 12 10 22 0.440 0.1617 0.1633 0.4644 0.4689
2005-06 Wasilla Spirit NAHL 55 17 11 28 0.509 0.1870 0.1796 0.5374 0.5160
2006-07 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 45 15 14 29 0.644 0.2368 0.2157 0.6802 0.6197
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 15 3 5 8 0.533
2008-09 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 23 8 7 15 0.652
2007-08 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 15 11 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2007-08 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+503.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24960
Forward overall
#842
Forward born in 1986
#1981
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Dunn
Adrian · 2014-15
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2005-06
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Pisciotta
Endicott · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.