IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Glaesmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Springfield Spirit NAHL 50 12 10 22 0.440 0.1634 0.1650 0.4659 0.4705
2005-06 Wasilla Spirit NAHL 55 17 11 28 0.509 0.1890 0.1815 0.5390 0.5176
2006-07 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 45 15 14 29 0.644 0.2393 0.2180 0.6823 0.6216
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Saint Mary's D3 — JR 15 3 5 8 0.533
2008-09 St. Mary's D3 — SO 23 8 7 15 0.652
2007-08 St. Mary's D3 — FR 25 15 11 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2007-08 · St. Mary's
+497.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19434
Forward overall
#773
Forward born in 1986
#1800
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Dunn
Adrian · 2014-15
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2005-06
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.