IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Austin Bruins NAHL 45 1 14 15 0.333 0.1225 0.1191 0.3518 0.3421
2014-15 Austin Bruins NAHL 50 4 25 29 0.580 0.2131 0.1961 0.6122 0.5633
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Adrian D1 NCHA SR 28 5 26 31 1.107
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 5 26 31 1.107
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 30 3 27 30 1.000
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 29 9 27 36 1.241
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 29 6 25 31 1.069
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2015-16 · Adrian
+585.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7308
Defenseman overall
#1137
Defenseman born in 1994
#2637
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cass
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.