IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Cass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Albert Lea Thunder NAHL 54 6 4 10 0.185 0.0680 0.0690 0.1955 0.1984
2009-10 Albert Lea Thunder NAHL 43 13 8 21 0.488 0.1794 0.1749 0.5155 0.5024
2010-11 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 33 10 11 21 0.636 0.2338 0.2160 0.6717 0.6205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 18 2 3 5 0.278
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 17 3 1 4 0.235
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 21 5 4 9 0.429
2011-12 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 25 7 15 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2011-12 · St. Thomas
+415.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29020
Forward overall
#1065
Forward born in 1990
#2566
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Dunn
Adrian · 2014-15
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.