← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Little Falls USHS-MN 27 17 24 41 1.518 0.4088 0.4088 0.3688 0.3688
2020-21 Little Falls USHS-MN 20 14 20 34 1.700 0.4576 0.4576 0.4129 0.4129
2021-22 NAHL 50 6 11 17 0.340 0.1262 0.1301 0.3600 0.3711
2022-23 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 54 10 14 24 0.444 0.1650 0.1620 0.4705 0.4619
2023-24 NAHL 57 20 23 43 0.754 0.2801 0.2616 0.7988 0.7460
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 30 9 15 24 0.800
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 23 7 12 19 0.826
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stout
+335.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19136
Forward overall
#773
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2022-23
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.