IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Board Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Oakville Blades OJHL 43 17 18 35 0.814 0.2274 0.2279 0.5617 0.5629
2012-13 — BCHL 56 10 19 29 0.518 0.2016 0.1937 0.7553 0.7255
2013-14 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 52 19 29 48 0.923 0.2579 0.2324 0.6370 0.5741
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC SR 26 10 20 30 1.154
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 10 24 34 1.360
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC SO 22 2 8 10 0.455
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC FR 21 8 6 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2014-15 · Neumann
+259.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16379
Forward overall
#619
Forward born in 1993
#1073
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Racek
Northland · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Ganchar
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.