IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Heisinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0963 0.0986 0.3153 0.3229
2013-14 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 54 1 16 17 0.315 0.0606 0.0590 0.1985 0.1932
2014-15 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 54 7 37 44 0.815 0.1568 0.1445 0.5138 0.4735
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE SR 19 1 8 9 0.474
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE SR 19 1 8 9 0.474
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE FR 25 6 13 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2015-16 · Curry
+630.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9354
Defenseman overall
#1332
Defenseman born in 1994
#617
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Hoogenboom
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Darcy
University of New England · 2017-18
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kittleson
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.