← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Kittleson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 44 5 8 13 0.295 0.1097 0.1097 0.3129 0.3129
2020-21 NAHL 46 8 10 18 0.391 0.1453 0.1453 0.4143 0.4143
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 32 6 13 19 0.594 0.2205 0.2062 0.6287 0.5880
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 25 7 17 24 0.960
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 24 2 11 13 0.542
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 25 6 19 25 1.000
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 5 1 3 4 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2022-23 · Lake Forest
+353.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24200
Forward overall
#911
Forward born in 2001
#2575
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Mary's · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.