IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryden McGhee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 36 5 8 13 0.361 0.1391 0.1405 0.5255 0.5309
2008-09 Canmore Eagles AJHL 58 23 34 57 0.983 0.3296 0.3200 0.9095 0.8831
2009-10 Canmore Eagles AJHL 54 23 34 57 1.056 0.3540 0.3256 0.9769 0.8986
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC — 5 1 1 2 0.400
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC — 20 5 6 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2010-11 · Williams
+98.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16778
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Savignac
Concordia · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dill
Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.