← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Currie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 4 0 3 3 0.750 0.1838 0.2026 0.5164 0.5691
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 3 6 9 0.173 0.0424 0.0446 0.1192 0.1254
2013-14 Toronto Patriots OJHL 33 1 8 9 0.273 0.0668 0.0669 0.1878 0.1880
2014-15 Toronto Patriots OJHL 53 10 22 32 0.604 0.1480 0.1405 0.4157 0.3947
2015-16 OJHL 54 8 42 50 0.926 0.2269 0.2029 0.6375 0.5701
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC 27 3 8 11 0.407
2018-19 Oswego D1 JR 28 3 15 18 0.643
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC 28 3 15 18 0.643
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC 26 0 7 7 0.269
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA 16 1 6 7 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2016-17 · Adrian
+160.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6740
Defenseman overall
#1091
Defenseman born in 1995
#1388
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.