IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Rice Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 53 10 10 20 0.377 0.1077 0.1128 0.2921 0.3058
2009-10 — CCHL 57 12 12 24 0.421 0.1202 0.1203 0.3260 0.3263
2010-11 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 11 0 4 4 0.364 0.1038 0.0988 0.2815 0.2678
2011-12 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 57 32 37 69 1.210 0.3455 0.3110 0.9370 0.8435
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2013-14 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 17 6 2 8 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2012-13 · SUNY Geneseo
+143.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18082
Forward overall
#713
Forward born in 1991
#514
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry McKinney
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
J.B. Baker
Nichols · 2015-16
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.