IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivan Galaguzov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-19 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 43 23 44 67 1.558 0.1878 0.1909 0.4922 0.5004
2017-18 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 30 43 73 1.622 0.1955 0.1888 0.5125 0.4951
2018-19 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 36 24 22 46 1.278 0.1540 0.1406 0.4037 0.3687
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 22 1 10 11 0.500
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 27 10 8 18 0.667
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 9 3 5 8 0.889
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 27 5 7 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2019-20 · Lawrence
+224.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23651
Forward overall
#964
Forward born in 1998
#247
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Reitter
Canton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Dietsch
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.