IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kangas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mahtomedi High USHS-MN 25 4 20 24 0.960 0.1215 0.1209 0.2332 0.2320
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 48 6 8 14 0.292 0.1072 0.1096 0.3079 0.3147
2017-18 — NAHL 52 5 10 15 0.288 0.1060 0.1031 0.3045 0.2962
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 53 19 22 41 0.774 0.2842 0.2637 0.8165 0.7576
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 6 2 3 5 0.833
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 19 2 7 9 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2019-20 · St. Thomas
+177.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27544
Forward overall
#1348
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lemirande
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Cole
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.