← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Witman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 38 11 8 19 0.500 0.1073 0.1174 0.2449 0.2679
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 47 24 28 52 1.106 0.2374 0.2489 0.5418 0.5681
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 49 37 25 62 1.265 0.2715 0.2696
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 23 6 4 10 0.435 0.1614 0.1508 0.4604 0.4302
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 24 6 5 11 0.458
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 22 4 2 6 0.273
2019-20 Fredonia D3 FR 20 2 1 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2019-20 · Fredonia
-11.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18527
Forward overall
#706
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.