| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 38 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.500 | 0.1155 | 0.1263 | 0.2447 | 0.2676 |
| 2016-17 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 47 | 24 | 28 | 52 | 1.106 | 0.2556 | 0.2680 | 0.5414 | 0.5677 |
| 2017-18 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 49 | 37 | 25 | 62 | 1.265 | 0.2923 | 0.2902 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | New Jersey Jr. Titans | NAHL | 23 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.435 | 0.1597 | 0.1492 | 0.4589 | 0.4288 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Fredonia | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 24 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2021-22 | Fredonia | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 22 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.273 |
| 2019-20 | Fredonia | D1 | SUNYAC | FR | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.150 |
| 2019-20 | Fredonia | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.150 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.