← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Wieber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Apollo High USHS-MN 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0561 0.0562 0.0506 0.0507
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 35 1 9 10 0.286 0.0344 0.0351 0.0903 0.0922
2017-18 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 35 7 8 15 0.429 0.0516 0.0500 0.1354 0.1313
2018-19 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 39 4 19 23 0.590 0.0711 0.0652 0.1863 0.1709
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 21 2 4 6 0.286
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2020-21 Saint John's D3 SO 10 2 7 9 0.900
2019-20 Saint John's D3 FR 22 6 10 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2019-20 · Saint John's
+1203.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19917
Defenseman overall
#2454
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.