IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Golanowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 40 4 4 8 0.200 0.0671 0.0717 0.1851 0.1977
2007-08 Calgary Canucks AJHL 61 3 6 9 0.147 0.0495 0.0501 0.1365 0.1382
2008-09 Calgary Canucks AJHL 62 15 18 33 0.532 0.1785 0.1733 0.4926 0.4784
2009-10 — AJHL 47 21 16 37 0.787 0.2640 0.2429 0.7285 0.6702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 29 8 10 18 0.621
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 18 3 4 7 0.389
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 28 5 11 16 0.571
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 23 3 2 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2010-11 · St. Scholastica
+18.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30647
Forward overall
#1021
Forward born in 1989
#969
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
George Splichal
Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.