IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Golanowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 40 4 4 8 0.200 0.0668 0.0713 0.1857 0.1983
2007-08 Calgary Canucks AJHL 61 3 6 9 0.147 0.0493 0.0499 0.1369 0.1386
2008-09 Calgary Canucks AJHL 62 15 18 33 0.532 0.1778 0.1727 0.4941 0.4798
2009-10 — AJHL 47 21 16 37 0.787 0.2629 0.2419 0.7308 0.6723
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 29 8 10 18 0.621
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 18 3 4 7 0.389
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 28 5 11 16 0.571
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 23 3 2 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2010-11 · St. Scholastica
+18.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21866
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1989
#1151
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
St. Mary's · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.