IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North York Rangers OJHL 45 5 9 14 0.311 0.0763 0.0763 0.2142 0.2142
2020-21 North York Rangers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — OJHL 41 6 13 19 0.463 0.1136 0.1037 0.3191 0.2913
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 4 13 17 0.654
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 25 4 7 11 0.440
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 20 5 7 12 0.600
2022-23 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 19 4 3 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2022-23 · Castleton
+314.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42646
Forward overall
#2415
Forward born in 2001
#2862
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Camden Davis
Chatham · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Dimatos
Hobart · 2023-24
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Charron
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.