← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Schmitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 15 1 5 6 0.400 0.1118 0.1210 0.2760 0.2988
2005-06 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 42 0 7 7 0.167 0.0466 0.0487 0.1150 0.1203
2006-07 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 33 3 9 12 0.364 0.1016 0.1012 0.2509 0.2498
2007-08 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0341 0.0324 0.0842 0.0800
2008-09 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 21 1 5 6 0.286 0.0798 0.0718 0.1972 0.1773
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC SR 17 2 8 10 0.588
2011-12 Utica D3 JR 12 2 6 8 0.667
2010-11 Utica D3 SO 18 2 5 7 0.389
2009-10 Utica D3 FR 15 2 7 9 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2009-10 · Utica
+1034.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17101
Defenseman overall
#1677
Defenseman born in 1988
#4634
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2015-16
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.