| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Buffalo Lightning | OJHL | 15 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.400 | 0.1118 | 0.1210 | 0.2760 | 0.2988 |
| 2005-06 | Buffalo Lightning | OJHL | 42 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.167 | 0.0466 | 0.0487 | 0.1150 | 0.1203 |
| 2006-07 | Buffalo Jr. Sabres | OJHL | 33 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.364 | 0.1016 | 0.1012 | 0.2509 | 0.2498 |
| 2007-08 | Buffalo Jr. Sabres | OJHL | 41 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.122 | 0.0341 | 0.0324 | 0.0842 | 0.0800 |
| 2008-09 | Buffalo Jr. Sabres | OJHL | 21 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.286 | 0.0798 | 0.0718 | 0.1972 | 0.1773 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SR | 17 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.588 |
| 2011-12 | Utica | D3 | — | JR | 12 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.667 |
| 2010-11 | Utica | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.389 |
| 2009-10 | Utica | D3 | — | FR | 15 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.600 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.