IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hogan Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NAHL 41 3 4 7 0.171 0.0634 0.0652 0.1807 0.1857
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 54 4 7 11 0.204 0.0756 0.0737 0.2157 0.2104
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 60 11 15 26 0.433 0.1609 0.1498 0.4588 0.4272
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 7 15 22 0.815
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE JR 26 4 14 18 0.692
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE SO 30 5 15 20 0.667
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 4 7 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2016-17 · Nichols
+298.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35422
Forward overall
#1493
Forward born in 1995
#4467
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Rook
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Mason
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.