← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hogan Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 NAHL 41 3 4 7 0.171 0.0627 0.0644 0.1802 0.1852
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 54 4 7 11 0.204 0.0748 0.0730 0.2150 0.2097
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 60 11 15 26 0.433 0.1592 0.1482 0.4573 0.4258
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nichols D1 CNE SR 27 7 15 22 0.815
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 7 15 22 0.815
2018-19 Nichols D1 CNE JR 26 4 14 18 0.692
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE JR 26 4 14 18 0.692
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE SO 30 5 15 20 0.667
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 4 7 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2016-17 · Nichols
+303.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42500
Forward overall
#1809
Forward born in 1995
#4614
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.