IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Fea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Rockets EHL 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.1073 0.1164 0.2449 0.2658
2016-17 Surrey Eagles BCHL 46 7 28 35 0.761 0.2961 0.2858 1.1096 1.0711
2017-18 — NAHL 13 1 5 6 0.462 0.1714 0.1589 0.4886 0.4528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 22 15 16 31 1.409
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 11 6 9 15 1.364
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 29 12 34 46 1.586
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 24 9 20 29 1.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2018-19 · Wilkes
+573.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21502
Forward overall
#905
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Shaheen
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stansik
Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.