IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timmy Nicksic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 9 12 21 0.389 0.1087 0.1091 0.2684 0.2695
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 53 21 39 60 1.132 0.3163 0.3001 0.7813 0.7412
2016-17 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 54 15 27 42 0.778 0.2888 0.2681 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 31 6 21 27 0.871
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 6 15 21 0.724
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 10 13 23 0.742
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 6 12 18 0.581
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+141.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13951
Forward overall
#543
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fraser Smith
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dahlseide
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.