← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Ruberto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 47 7 11 18 0.383 0.1070 0.1164 0.2643 0.2874
2006-07 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 49 6 11 17 0.347 0.0969 0.1005 0.2394 0.2483
2007-08 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 48 18 25 43 0.896 0.2503 0.2483 0.6182 0.6134
2008-09 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 50 27 57 84 1.680 0.4694 0.4416 1.1594 1.0909
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 9 10 19 0.760
2011-12 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 6 2 8 0.320
2010-11 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 5 12 17 0.680
2009-10 Hamilton D3 FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2009-10 · Hamilton
+41.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9466
Forward overall
#374
Forward born in 1989
#386
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.