← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Catanzaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 49 20 29 49 1.000 0.2451 0.2383 0.6885 0.6693
2002-03 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 43 25 24 49 1.139 0.2793 0.2600 0.7845 0.7302
2003-04 Philadelphia Revolution EJHL 31 8 16 24 0.774 0.2294 0.2080
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 18 2 5 7 0.389
2007-08 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 15 6 10 16 1.067
2006-07 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 24 8 17 25 1.042
2005-06 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 24 10 13 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2005-06 · SUNY Cortland
+389.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17901
Forward overall
#584
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.