IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Catanzaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 49 20 29 49 1.000 0.2794 0.2716 0.6901 0.6709
2002-03 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 43 25 24 49 1.139 0.3184 0.2964 0.7864 0.7320
2003-04 Philadelphia Revolution EJHL 31 8 16 24 0.774 0.2294 0.2080 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 18 2 5 7 0.389
2007-08 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 15 6 10 16 1.067
2006-07 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 24 8 17 25 1.042
2005-06 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 24 10 13 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2005-06 · SUNY Cortland
+360.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12886
Forward overall
#490
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caleb Serre
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kitto
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.