← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Serre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 52 17 21 38 0.731 0.1232 0.1307 0.3036 0.3220
2018-19 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 50 25 36 61 1.220 0.2057 0.1971 0.5069 0.4857
2019-20 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 55 47 66 113 2.054 0.3464 0.3464 0.8536 0.8536
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 25 2 6 8 0.320
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 26 3 6 9 0.346
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 25 1 14 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Stout
+311.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14498
Forward overall
#516
Forward born in 1999
#30
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2009-10
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.