← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ludvig Mellgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-30 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Almtuna IS · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SuperElit 38 1 1 2 0.053 0.0208 0.0214 0.0646 0.0666
2022-23 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SHL-J20 44 3 9 12 0.273 0.1506 0.1479 0.3640 0.3575
2023-24 Almtuna IS U20 SuperElit 44 6 20 26 0.591 0.2332 0.2177 0.7258 0.6775
2024-25 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 3 24 27 0.519 0.1844 0.1717 0.5451 0.5074
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 24 7 13 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
+364.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4366
Defenseman overall
#1149
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.