IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrey Manov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-30 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 31 10 15 25 0.806 0.1148 0.1150 0.3346 0.3353
2023-24 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 52 12 50 62 1.192 0.1698 0.1612 0.4947 0.4698
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 22 1 8 9 0.409
2024-25 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 22 3 7 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2024-25 · Buffalo State
+237.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8077
Defenseman overall
#1875
Defenseman born in 2003
#399
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zepeda
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Ursitti
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.