IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrey Manov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-30 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 31 10 15 25 0.806 0.1347 0.1350 0.3357 0.3364
2023-24 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 52 12 50 62 1.192 0.1991 0.1891 0.4964 0.4714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 22 1 8 9 0.409
2024-25 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 22 3 7 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2024-25 · Buffalo State
+187.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8305
Defenseman overall
#1895
Defenseman born in 2003
#400
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zepeda
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Bettmeng
Becker · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.