IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Gallagher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 60 20 13 33 0.550 0.2141 0.2135 0.8021 0.7998
2003-04 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 55 15 10 25 0.455 0.1769 0.1685 0.6628 0.6314
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Marian D3 — FR 27 13 15 28 1.037
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2004-05 · Marian
+549.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21210
Forward overall
#725
Forward born in 1983
#1907
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Wosnack
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Parks
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Ladzinski
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.387 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.