IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Parks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 55 11 18 29 0.527 0.1958 0.1875 0.5583 0.5347
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Finlandia D3 — SR 28 16 20 36 1.286
2006-07 Finlandia D3 — JR 24 12 16 28 1.167
2005-06 Finlandia D3 — SO 21 11 13 24 1.143
2004-05 Finlandia D3 — FR 24 9 20 29 1.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2004-05 · Finlandia
+652.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20744
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 1984
#2015
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ricky Kramer
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Totten
Nichols · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.