IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Dougherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 41 26 29 55 1.341 0.1760 0.1701 0.4554 0.4401
2023-24 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 41 10 35 45 1.098 0.1440 0.1322 0.3726 0.3421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 20 1 2 3 0.150
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9683
Forward overall
#426
Forward born in 2003
#406
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Antenucci
Trine · 2021-22
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Quesnel
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marco Iozzo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.