IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Zepeda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.4246 0.4447 1.9979 2.0924
2009-10 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 37 4 5 9 0.243 0.1549 0.1523 0.7288 0.7166
2010-11 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 54 15 16 31 0.574 0.3656 0.3410 1.7204 1.6048
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 47 9 13 22 0.468 0.2981 0.2642 1.4028 1.2430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 6 2 3 5 0.833
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 7 12 19 0.704
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 9 13 22 0.759
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 9 14 23 0.821
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2012-13 · St. Norbert
+225.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11466
Forward overall
#456
Forward born in 1991
#1798
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.