IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan LaValley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 16 5 16 21 1.312 0.0853 0.0959 0.2956 0.3322
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 34 8 23 31 0.912 0.1334 0.1334 0.4471 0.4471
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 17 24 41 0.911 0.1333 0.1329 0.4467 0.4452
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 25 4 12 16 0.640
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 22 4 9 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2022-23 · Buffalo State
+484.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15277
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Nemgar
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
2.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Simm
Chatham · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Roach
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.