← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Nemgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 27 1 5 6 0.222 0.0825 0.0803 0.2353 0.2290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 FR 1 1 1 2 2.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
2.00
2011-12 · St. Scholastica
+2811.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42679
Forward overall
#1631
Forward born in 1991
#5547
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2010-11
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.