← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Foster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 43 18 24 42 0.977 0.0908 0.0931 0.2237 0.2293
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 13 24 37 0.861 0.1129 0.1152 0.2921 0.2980
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 29 9 24 33 1.138 0.1493 0.1451 0.3863 0.3755
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 42 20 40 60 1.429 0.1874 0.1712 0.4850 0.4430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 30 2 4 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Franklin Pierce
+45.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9539
Forward overall
#380
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.