IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pearce Vance Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Michigan Mountain Cats NA3HL 46 13 20 33 0.717 0.0864 0.0877 0.2266 0.2301
2014-15 Metro Jets NA3HL 44 17 33 50 1.136 0.1369 0.1323 0.3590 0.3469
2015-16 Metro Jets NA3HL 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.1123 0.1030 0.2944 0.2701
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 26 5 9 14 0.538
2017-18 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 22 4 2 6 0.273
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 21 6 4 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2016-17 · Westfield State
+384.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34830
Forward overall
#1467
Forward born in 1995
#893
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew MacKenzie
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Merritt
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Monfredo
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.