IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Edvin Robertsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-17 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 47 9 2 11 0.234 0.0923 0.0907 0.2874 0.2825
2022-23 — NCDC 41 4 12 16 0.390 0.0902 0.0891 0.3155 0.3115
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 50 14 10 24 0.480 0.1109 0.1032 0.3881 0.3612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC SO 24 7 6 13 0.542
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC — 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2024-25 · Alvernia
+570.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25121
Forward overall
#1397
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Danilchev
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Topher Flanagan
Amherst · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Lyon
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.