← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Boyce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 48 9 29 38 0.792 0.1829 0.1807 0.3874 0.3827
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 39 12 30 42 1.077 0.2488 0.2333 0.5269 0.4941
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 23 4 7 11 0.478
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+66.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2627
Defenseman overall
#594
Defenseman born in 1998
#177
in EHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.