← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Pizzey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0279 0.0279 0.0772 0.0772
2021-22 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 9 19 28 0.467 0.1565 0.1503 0.4325 0.4152
2022-23 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 56 8 22 30 0.536 0.1797 0.1636 0.4965 0.4521
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA JR 19 1 5 6 0.316
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA 27 3 3 6 0.222
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC 3 1 1 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2023-24 · Alvernia
+392.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39164
Forward overall
#2434
Forward born in 2002
#1470
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.