← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Chickering Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 7 11 18 0.562 0.1114 0.1114 0.2563 0.2563
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 25 6 9 15 0.600 0.1189 0.1189 0.2734 0.2734
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 26 2 7 9 0.346 0.1411 0.1411 0.2783 0.2783
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 47 17 17 34 0.723 0.2949 0.2745 0.5815 0.5412
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of New England D3 CNE SR 28 14 16 30 1.071
2024-25 University of New England D3 CNE 27 10 6 16 0.593
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE 26 6 6 12 0.462
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE 8 2 1 3 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · University of New England
+106.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15404
Forward overall
#726
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.