IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Sweet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 38 10 15 25 0.658 0.0742 0.0742 0.2234 0.2234
2021-22 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 35 18 25 43 1.229 0.1386 0.1418 0.4171 0.4268
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 42 16 18 34 0.809 0.1185 0.1189 0.3965 0.3978
2023-24 New York Apple Core EHL 43 20 37 57 1.326 0.1941 0.1849 0.6493 0.6186
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 25 4 7 11 0.440
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 22 3 6 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2024-25 · Salem State
+201.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9433
Forward overall
#406
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mack Heisinger
Curry · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Board
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.