IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew DeAngelis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 39 10 18 28 0.718 0.0663 0.0643 0.1644 0.1594
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 39 8 22 30 0.769 0.0882 0.0787 0.1734 0.1547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 24 3 8 11 0.458
2016-17 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 22 3 4 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2016-17 · Worcester State
+409.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39188
Forward overall
#1639
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Stewart
Canton · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Tanskanen
New England College · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Alvarado
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.