IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Dells Ducks USPHL-Elite 39 12 10 22 0.564 0.0676 0.0652 — —
2017-18 Seahawks Hockey EHL 49 9 10 19 0.388 0.0832 0.0778 0.1899 0.1775
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Canton D3 — — 11 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Canton D3 — — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44235
Forward overall
#2118
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Laurila
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike DeGrazia
UMass Boston · 2008-09
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McLean
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.