IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike DeGrazia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 29 3 4 7 0.241 0.0896 0.0952 0.2556 0.2715
2006-07 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 51 9 16 25 0.490 0.1820 0.1844 0.5190 0.5258
2007-08 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 57 12 31 43 0.754 0.2801 0.2700 0.7988 0.7699
2008-09 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 55 12 9 21 0.382 0.1418 0.1296 0.4042 0.3695
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 27 17 18 35 1.296
2011-12 UMass Boston D3 — JR 25 5 18 23 0.920
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 — SO 14 4 5 9 0.643
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 — FR 15 3 4 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2009-10 · UMass Boston
+193.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20851
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1988
#2037
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Crivello
Nichols · 2015-16
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Deady
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.