IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike DeGrazia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 29 3 4 7 0.241 0.0887 0.0942 0.2551 0.2710
2006-07 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 51 9 16 25 0.490 0.1801 0.1824 0.5181 0.5248
2007-08 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 57 12 31 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2672 0.7973 0.7685
2008-09 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 55 12 9 21 0.382 0.1403 0.1283 0.4035 0.3689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SR 27 17 18 35 1.296
2011-12 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 25 5 18 23 0.920
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 14 4 5 9 0.643
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 15 3 4 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2009-10 · UMass Boston
+196.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27157
Forward overall
#907
Forward born in 1988
#2274
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Crivello
Nichols · 2015-16
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Deady
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.