IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Laurila Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — NA3HL 44 14 25 39 0.886 0.1068 0.1032 0.2800 0.2707
2023-24 North Iowa Bulls NAHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0636 0.0593 0.1815 0.1691
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 20 5 6 11 0.550

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42066
Forward overall
#2207
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Dittel
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Callow
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Olson
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.