IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jagur McClelland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0609 0.0627 0.1615 0.1663
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 50 3 9 12 0.240 0.0951 0.0934 0.2520 0.2474
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 22 18 40 0.678 0.2686 0.2496 0.7118 0.6615
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC FR 20 1 4 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Utica
+56.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33831
Forward overall
#2042
Forward born in 2004
#3326
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
St. Mary's · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.