IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Vieten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0233 0.0233 0.0911 0.0911
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 38 5 4 9 0.237 0.0938 0.0938 0.2486 0.2486
2021-22 — NAHL 54 11 15 26 0.481 0.1908 0.1770 0.5055 0.4689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 22 5 4 9 0.409
2023-24 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 24 3 6 9 0.375
2022-23 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 20 3 4 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Williams
+131.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42092
Forward overall
#2385
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Allen
Marian · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.