| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 61 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 0.344 | 0.0747 | 0.0737 | 0.2664 | 0.2629 |
| 2013-14 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 61 | 28 | 24 | 52 | 0.853 | 0.1849 | 0.1732 | 0.6596 | 0.6180 |
| 2016-17 | Univ. of Ottawa | USports-M | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.143 | 0.0754 | 0.0747 | 0.4188 | 0.4148 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Norwich | D3 | LittleEast | — | 27 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.370 |
| 2014-15 | Norwich | D3 | LittleEast | — | 20 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0.300 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.