← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simren Sandhu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-23 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Ottawa · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Calgary Canucks AJHL 63 14 26 40 0.635 0.2129 0.2361 0.5875 0.6516
2003-04 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 18 28 46 0.767 0.2572 0.2717 0.7095 0.7495
2004-05 Calgary Canucks AJHL 64 15 36 51 0.797 0.2673 0.2697 0.7375 0.7440
2005-06 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 44 13 18 31 0.705 0.2714 0.2620 1.0253 0.9899
2006-07 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 25 3 9 12 0.480 0.1849 0.1686 0.6985 0.6369
2009-10 Univ. of Ottawa USports-M 13 7 9 16 1.231 0.6494 0.6170 3.6075 3.4274
2010-11 Univ. of Ottawa USports-M 14 3 0 3 0.214 0.1131 0.1023 0.6281 0.5680
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2007-08 · St. Scholastica
+104.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15329
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2013-14
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.