IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 33 6 9 15 0.455 0.1751 0.1824 0.6623 0.6900
2008-09 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 6 20 26 0.433 0.1670 0.1670 0.6314 0.6313
2009-10 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 26 24 50 0.926 0.3567 0.3372 1.3491 1.2753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Williams D3 NESCAC — 25 6 9 15 0.600
2012-13 Williams D3 NESCAC — 26 8 12 20 0.769
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC — 26 11 13 24 0.923
2010-11 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 25 13 9 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2010-11 · Hamilton
+281.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21562
Forward overall
#717
Forward born in 1989
#1101
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McNulty
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.