IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Fiorino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 42 6 5 11 0.262 0.0562 0.0592 0.1283 0.1352
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 37 3 17 20 0.540 0.0728 0.0714 0.1840 0.1805
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 24 5 14 19 0.792
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 25 6 12 18 0.720
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 27 5 11 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2018-19 · Southern New Hampshire
+843.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17978
Defenseman overall
#2281
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Armand Uomoleale
New England · 2013-14
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Ostrowski
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam McInnis
Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.